Australia news live: Lehrmann’s appeal argument an ‘astonishing admission’, court told; Albanese says he doesn’t take Netanyahu criticism personally



Argument that Lehrmann may have changed evidence about rape an ‘astonishing admission’, court hears

Nino Bucci

Zali Burrows, Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer, has finished her oral submissions to his appeal, but is expected to ask questions in reply later in the hearing.

Justice Wigney, from the full court of the federal court, told Burrows she will not be able to raise new matters in these replies, and she was denied the opportunity to make final written submissions after the hearing.

Dr Matt Collins KC is making submissions on behalf of Network Ten. He said he welcomed Justice Colvin’s comments regarding the “so-called distinction between a violent and non-violent rape”.

Bruce Lehrmann
Bruce Lehrmann. Photograph: Dean Lewins/AAP

Collins said his submissions before Lee were “as simple as this: if sexual intercourse were found, and Ms Higgins was found not to have consented to sexual intercourse, and it was accepted that Mr Lehrmann knew she was intoxicated, the ordinary person would be convinced that it was a rape”.

Collins also made clear, however, that the case was a defamation trial, not a rape trial.

Burrows’ submission made earlier on Wednesday – that Lehrmann’s evidence before Lee might have been different if it was known that he would make the finding he did about the rape – was “an astonishing admission”, Collins said.

He said that Burrows’ argument appeared to be that Lehrmann may have given evidence that he had sexual intercourse with Higgins and that she consented if he’d known Lee would make the finding he did:

That was never the way he ran his case.

Collins also said Lee found the rape was violent, including finding that Higgins woke up during the rape and couldn’t “get the words out to scream or resist”.

“Those circumstances are awful,” Collins said.

The hearing continues.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Catie McLeod

Catie McLeod

Breville working to move machine production out of China amid Trump tariffs

Breville is rapidly accelerating its strategy of shifting manufacturing away from China as the ASX-listed home appliance company seeks to counteract the financial hit of the Trump administration’s tariff regime.

The Australian manufacturer, which is based in Sydney but sells its appliances around the world, this morning unveiled a 10.9% rise in sales to $1.7bn in the 12 months to June 30, and a 14.6% increase in net profit to $135.9m.

The growth was led by Breville’s coffee products in all of its three global markets: the Americas; Europe, the Middle East and Africa; and the Asia Pacific.

Photograph: Jason Reed/Reuters

Breville started moving the production of its 120V coffee machines out of China soon after last year’s US election, and sent additional inventory into the US early as a “hedge against potential tariffs”.

The company’s results for the past financial year, released this morning, show these tactics appear to be paying off.

In a presentation to investors, Breville confirmed it was still manufacturing its 240-volt products – which are sold everywhere except North America – in China.

The company revealed it was now making about 65% of its US profits from products manufactured in Europe, southeast Asia and Mexico, up from just 15% at the start of its “manufacturing diversification program”.

By the end of the year, Breville expects non-China production to make up 80% of its US profits and the company says it will continue diversifying its manufacturing until at least the end of 2028.


Source link


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *